Why Well-being Programs Should Think More Like Marketers

Your employees are not sitting around waiting for another benefit communication.

They are deciding what deserves attention while juggling work, family, email, deadlines, appointments, financial concerns, and whatever else is happening that day.

That is why we think well-being programs need more than communication. They need marketing.

Communication transfers information. Marketing creates perceived value and motivates action.

There is an important difference.

An administrator might say, “The financial wellness webinar is available Thursday at noon.”

A marketer asks, “Why would this person give up 30 minutes on Thursday, and what problem do they believe the webinar will help solve?”

That does not mean manipulating employees. It means respecting their limited attention enough to explain why something may be valuable before asking them to act.

One framing we use is to treat the well-being administrator like the CEO of the program.

Employees are the customers.
The well-being experience is the product.
Participation is the desired action.
The value has to be evident enough for employees to choose it over competing demands.

That starts with a clear value proposition.

At the program level, employees should understand what the overall experience is for. That is the macro-value proposition.

At the activity level, they need a reason to care about this particular challenge, screening, pathway, event, or benefit. That is the micro-value proposition.

The same challenge can have several legitimate forms of value. One employee may care about the gift card. Another cares about beating a neighboring department. Another wants accountability. Another wants more energy. Another simply likes contributing to a shared company goal.

The mistake is assuming one message captures all of them.

Marketing also changes how we think about channels and timing. “We sent three emails” is an activity measure. It does not tell us whether the right employees saw the message at a useful time.

A shift employee may respond better to a pre-shift huddle, QR code, text, or preferred email. A remote employee may be digitally reachable but already overloaded with digital communication. A field employee may need a mobile-first experience.

Then we measure the behavior, not just the message.

Did employees see it?
Did they click?
Did they register?
Did they complete the desired action?
Did they do something after that?

Well-being programs compete for attention just like everything else.

If we want employees to choose a healthy action, we have to do more than announce that the option exists.

We have to make the value clear.

One practical marketing exercise is to write three versions of the value proposition for the same activity.

One should emphasize personal benefit, one social value, and one practical or financial value.

Then ask a small group of employees which version feels most relevant and why. You are not trying to create dozens of personas. You are learning which forms of value already exist in the activity and which ones your current communication ignores.

That insight can improve subject lines, manager talking points, posters, and in-platform messages without changing the underlying program at all.

Want more? Check out our full library of past issues here.