The Hidden Barrier to Well-being Engagement

Most leaders believe low well-being engagement comes from lack of interest, lack of time, or lack of discipline. In reality, the strongest force working against your program is something far more universal.

Employees default to inaction because it is familiar, emotionally safe, and requires no psychological effort. Even when people want to change, the pull of doing nothing often feels more comfortable than the uncertainty of starting something new.

Understanding the psychology of inaction allows leaders to rethink how they design and communicate well-being.

When employees feel that the reward is worth the effort, and when the first step feels achievable, participation shifts quickly. The goal is not to force action. The goal is to make action feel like the natural next step.

Why Information Alone Does Not Drive Change

Many employers assume employees need more facts, more education, or more detailed instructions. Yet advocacy-based communication rarely produces sustained behavior change.

Knowing the right thing to do does not always translate into doing it.

Your employees experience the same gap that shows up in everyday life. For example, most people know they should floss, but compliance tends to spike only in the hours before a dental appointment.

Employees already understand the general benefits of health. The issue (generally) is not awareness. It is motivation. Information must connect to an emotionally relevant outcome before it influences behavior. Without that connection, the Knowing and Doing Gap remains firmly in place.

Why Access Alone Is Not Enough

Enablement strategies assume that if we remove barriers, people will naturally take action. Access does matter, but access alone cannot overcome internal states such as exhaustion, low confidence, low self-efficacy, or impulsivity. Research shows that these psychosocial factors strongly predict unhealthy behaviors even when external barriers are removed.

This means that handing employees more tools does not guarantee engagement. If the program does not feel personally meaningful, the tools simply sit unused. Engagement comes from a sense of purpose, not just convenience.

The Effort Versus Reward Problem

Human behavior is guided by a simple internal calculation. People constantly ask themselves whether the effort required is worth the reward. If the effort feels too high, employees discount the value of the outcome. However, the opposite is also true. When the effort becomes too low, people assume the reward is insignificant.

This is particularly relevant to well-being programs. Many leaders respond to low participation by reducing effort requirements. They shorten challenges, focus on easy activities, or remove structure entirely. Although this feels helpful, it often reduces the perceived value. Low effort communicates that the experience will not produce meaningful results.

Behavioral psychology shows that effort becomes motivating when it is paired with a clear, desirable, and believable outcome. When people believe, “If I put in this work, I will receive this benefit,” motivation rises. This sense of personal influence is essential for forming long-term habits.

Three Ways to Help Employees Overcome Inaction

1. Make the Future Feel More Desirable Than the Present

Encourage employees to use Episodic Future Thinking, which invites them to imagine the version of themselves who has more energy, greater emotional bandwidth, or more consistency in their routines. When a healthier future feels vivid and relevant, employees become far more willing to start.

2. Design Effort That Feels Meaningful

Programs should require meaningful action. Effort should feel like an investment, not a burden. When employees feel that their work is essential to the outcome, effort justification increases their satisfaction and strengthens habit formation.

3. Remove Confusion and Invisible Friction

Even simple obstacles can stop momentum, such as confusing instructions, unclear expectations, or cumbersome processes. Removing friction helps employees feel capable of beginning, while meaningful effort keeps them engaged once they start.

Propel helps organizations overcome the psychological gravity of inaction by pairing meaningful effort with meaningful value.

We use behavioral science to help employees imagine their future, commit to purposeful action, and experience real progress. Our fully customized well-being platform removes friction, reinforces habit formation, and guides teams through sustainable behavior change.

If you want to learn more about how we combine your custom program with strategies backed by science, schedule a time to speak with us here.

Implications for the well-being administrator:

• Inaction is the strongest competitor to your well-being program because it is comfortable and requires no psychological effort.

• Employees take action when the perceived reward feels personally meaningful and directly connected to their effort.

• Programs that establish future value, purposeful effort, and low friction make action feel natural instead of forced.

Want more? Check out our full library of past issues here.